Todays, oil and gas sources are explored in deep water and harsh environment. A riser system is one of the major sub-facilities to transfer oil and gas from the seabed to the host platform. One of the well-known riser systems, the Steel Catenary Riser (SCR), has been an attractive choice for the riser system in deep water. However, the main challenge of the SCR is large motions from the host platforms due to the harsh environment. The large motion of host platforms may induce excessive buckling and fatigue at the touchdown point. The key component of the large motion of the host platform is the downward velocity at the hang-off point where the top-end of the riser is attached to the host platform. By screening the downward velocities at the hang-off point in the time history graph, the time at which the critical responses (i.e. buckling utilization, bending moment and compression) peak is identified. This study investigates the feasibility of the SCR configuration in terms of the capability to cope with the vessel motion. Several types of the SCR configurations are proposed in this study. The selected configurations of SCR in this study are conventional SCR, Weight Distributed SCR (WDSCR), and Steel Lazy Wave Riser (SLWR). The feasibility of the three riser configurations was analyzed in terms of strength and fatigue performance to understand the limitation of one over the other. The strength assessment of the risers was performed by using load cases, the screening approach was based on different extreme downward velocities at the hang-off point. The checks were according to DNV. The fatigue performance of the risers was checked considering both wave-induced fatigue and fatigue due to vortex induced vibration. Overall, from the extreme response analysis study, results showed that a feasible conventional SCR configuration can be obtained if the downward velocity at the hang-off point is restricted below 2.6 m/s. It is also found that the downward velocity at the sag-bend of the conventional SCR is restricted below 3.03 m/s. On the other hand, a feasible WDSCR configuration can be obtained, if the downward velocity at the hang-off point is restricted below 3.2 m/s. It is also found that the downward velocity at the sag-bend of the WDSCR is restricted below 3.43 m/s. The heavy cross section of WDSCR reduces the critical responses (i.e. bending moment, compression and utilization) at the TDP and extends the feasibility of the SCR. The results showed that the SLWR configuration can cope even with a downward velocity of 6 m/s at the hang-off point. The “lazy wave” configuration efficiently absorbs the vessel heave motions. Thereby the SLWR configuration is proven to be the most robust configuration to cope with large motion of the host platform. This study proves that although the SCR feasibility is limited due to vessel heave motion, innovative solutions can be established to extend its feasibility in order to cope with the vessel heave motion in harsh environment.
展开▼
机译:如今,石油和天然气在深水和恶劣环境中进行了勘探。立管系统是将石油和天然气从海底转移到主机平台的主要子设施之一。钢制悬链提升管(SCR)是一种著名的立管系统,已成为深水立管系统的诱人选择。但是,SCR的主要挑战是由于恶劣的环境,主机平台会产生较大的运动。主机平台的大运动可能会在着陆点处引起过度的屈曲和疲劳。主机平台大运动的关键部分是在上升点的顶端连接到主机平台的悬挂点处的向下速度。通过在时间历程图中的挂断点处筛选下行速度,可以确定关键响应(即屈曲利用率,弯矩和压缩)达到峰值的时间。这项研究从应对船舶运动的能力方面研究了SCR配置的可行性。这项研究中提出了几种类型的SCR配置。在这项研究中,SCR的选定配置为常规SCR,重量分布SCR(WDSCR)和钢懒人立管(SLWR)。从强度和疲劳性能方面分析了三种立管构型的可行性,以了解它们之间的局限性。立管的强度评估是通过使用荷载工况进行的,筛查方法是基于悬挂点的不同极端向下速度。根据DNV进行检查。既考虑了波浪引起的疲劳,又考虑了涡旋振动引起的疲劳,检查了立管的疲劳性能。总体而言,从极端响应分析研究中,结果表明,如果将悬挂点的下行速度限制在2.6 m / s以下,则可以获得可行的常规SCR配置。还发现,常规SCR的下垂弯曲处的向下速度被限制在3.03m / s以下。另一方面,如果将悬挂点的下降速度限制在3.2 m / s以下,则可以获得可行的WDSCR配置。还发现,WDSCR的垂度下降速度被限制在3.43 m / s以下。 WDSCR的横截面较大,可降低TDP处的临界响应(即弯矩,压缩和利用率),并扩展了SCR的可行性。结果表明,SLWR构造即使在悬挂点下降速度为6 m / s时也能应付。 “惰性波”配置有效地吸收了船的起伏运动。因此,SLWR配置被证明是应对主机平台大运动的最可靠配置。这项研究证明,尽管SCR的可行性由于船只的起伏运动而受到限制,但可以建立创新的解决方案来扩展其可行性,以应对恶劣环境中的船只的起伏运动。
展开▼